University wayfinding: A master class in confusion

February 20, 2025 by

Max van IJsselmuiden

This is part of my ongoing series exploring frustrating user experiences we encounter in everyday life. These real-world UX failures show how design thinking (or lack thereof) forgets common sense.

Every now and then, I give workshops and lectures at universities. To prepare, I visit the offices of very smart people – professors. In this case, I was meeting a professor of Human-Computer Interaction at the University of Groningen.

His email instructions were straightforward: go to the Harmonie building, officially known as building 1311, and find room 0723. Simple enough.

I had studied at the University of Groningen myself, so I already knew where the Harmonie building was. That meant I could safely ignore 1311—one less thing to think about. I walked in, climbed the stairs and headed for level 7, assuming the 7 in 0723 referred to the floor number. Common sense.

At level 7, I was met with four possible directions. No problem—I’d just follow the signs. I scanned my surroundings. Toilets. Department X. Department Y. Nothing about room numbers. Inconvenient.

Plan B: pick a hallway and try my luck.

I started with the closest one. A few turns later, I found 0723. Perfect! Except… the name on the door wasn’t the professor’s. Maybe he moved in recently and they haven’t updated the nameplate yet? I waited a couple of minutes, then checked again. 0723. He must be late.

Wait. There was a number before 0723: 1314.0723.

What was the correct building number again?

I pulled up my calendar: 1311.0723.

Wrong building.

Back to the main staircase. Another hallway. This time, I paid closer attention to the room numbers. 1311.0756. 1311.0758. 1311. Okay, so I was in the right building now. Unfortunately the room numbers still didn’t match the one I needed.

Two more hallways to go.

And there it was—finally—the right office, with the right name on the door. Just to be sure, I checked the number again. 1311.0723. The professor greeted me and made a joke about my tardiness. I suggested we meet at my office next time.

Design isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about function. When design fails, we feel immediate frustration, even if we don’t recognize it as a design problem. These moments aren’t just annoyances—they’re design failures, symptoms of a deeper problem. Each represents a failure of design thinking, where creators lost sight of the actual humans who would use their products and systems.

Newer

April 8, 2025

A simple challenge to make tea becomes a 15-minute ordeal with an 'innovative' office water boiler that requires hovering, swiping, and consulting a manual for basic operation. The touchless hypermodern interface promises hygiene benefits but delivers unnecessary complexity that turns getting hot water into a multi-step puzzle. A perfect example of how over-engineering simple tasks creates frustration when basic buttons would work infinitely better.

Older

February 20, 2025

A cautionary tale of terrible UX design: how food delivery apps create frustrating login flows and fail to update delivery addresses, turning a simple pizza order into an hour-long disaster.

Want me to write about a topic? Something interesting to share? Just let me know.

University wayfinding: A master class in confusion

February 20, 2025 by

Max van IJsselmuiden

This is part of my ongoing series exploring frustrating user experiences we encounter in everyday life. These real-world UX failures show how design thinking (or lack thereof) forgets common sense.

Every now and then, I give workshops and lectures at universities. To prepare, I visit the offices of very smart people – professors. In this case, I was meeting a professor of Human-Computer Interaction at the University of Groningen.

His email instructions were straightforward: go to the Harmonie building, officially known as building 1311, and find room 0723. Simple enough.

I had studied at the University of Groningen myself, so I already knew where the Harmonie building was. That meant I could safely ignore 1311—one less thing to think about. I walked in, climbed the stairs and headed for level 7, assuming the 7 in 0723 referred to the floor number. Common sense.

At level 7, I was met with four possible directions. No problem—I’d just follow the signs. I scanned my surroundings. Toilets. Department X. Department Y. Nothing about room numbers. Inconvenient.

Plan B: pick a hallway and try my luck.

I started with the closest one. A few turns later, I found 0723. Perfect! Except… the name on the door wasn’t the professor’s. Maybe he moved in recently and they haven’t updated the nameplate yet? I waited a couple of minutes, then checked again. 0723. He must be late.

Wait. There was a number before 0723: 1314.0723.

What was the correct building number again?

I pulled up my calendar: 1311.0723.

Wrong building.

Back to the main staircase. Another hallway. This time, I paid closer attention to the room numbers. 1311.0756. 1311.0758. 1311. Okay, so I was in the right building now. Unfortunately the room numbers still didn’t match the one I needed.

Two more hallways to go.

And there it was—finally—the right office, with the right name on the door. Just to be sure, I checked the number again. 1311.0723. The professor greeted me and made a joke about my tardiness. I suggested we meet at my office next time.

Design isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about function. When design fails, we feel immediate frustration, even if we don’t recognize it as a design problem. These moments aren’t just annoyances—they’re design failures, symptoms of a deeper problem. Each represents a failure of design thinking, where creators lost sight of the actual humans who would use their products and systems.

Newer

April 8, 2025

A simple challenge to make tea becomes a 15-minute ordeal with an 'innovative' office water boiler that requires hovering, swiping, and consulting a manual for basic operation. The touchless hypermodern interface promises hygiene benefits but delivers unnecessary complexity that turns getting hot water into a multi-step puzzle. A perfect example of how over-engineering simple tasks creates frustration when basic buttons would work infinitely better.

Older

February 20, 2025

A cautionary tale of terrible UX design: how food delivery apps create frustrating login flows and fail to update delivery addresses, turning a simple pizza order into an hour-long disaster.

Want me to write about a topic? Something interesting to share? Just let me know.